Dennis's Auto Blog Subscribe To This Blog
Monday June 01, 2009 at 10:41 pm
GM Bankruptcy Needed


Did you hear the automaker that offers more hybrid models than any company filed for bankruptcy protection the other day? Yes. It’s General Motors. You’d never learn that hybrid fact from the mainstream media about GM. In recent years you didn’t hear much about GM’s hybrids because many reporters were too busy insisting that GM just makes gas-guzzling SUV’s and trucks.

The fact is GM was ready with products that were beginning to take hold in the world marketplace when credit for new car loans simply dried up last year. You can thank all those lenders who decided everyone with a pulse should get a home mortgage for the credit crunch that ultimately forced GM into bankruptcy.

As recently as the late 90’s, GM was still making record profits. But the company also did not put as much of that cash into research and development as some of the import companies and that too ultimately hurt GM. One big reason GM did not that pump enough into R and D are excessive union labor contracts that required the company to spend more on health care for retirees than it did on steel to build vehicles. The bankruptcy will break those agreements. Of course GM originally agreed to those contracts years ago and that was the fault of the automaker’s leadership, or lack thereof.

Let’s hope the government bailout of GM and subsequent restructuring leads to a company that can survive and grow in the world marketplace. I’ve been reviewing new cars and trucks on a weekly basis now for about five years and I can tell you GM’s products have the stuff to make it. What’s your take on the GM bankruptcy?

Your Name
(appears on your post)
For security reasons, please type in the above letters



Please leave your comments below:

Comments on GM Bankruptcy Needed
Thomas McLaughlin
The GMC truck division should not continue as a part of GM. GM and the US government have one chance to get the reinvention of the new GM right and avoid continued government and taxpayer support.

Domestic and import full-size truck and SUV sales are declining with fuel economy concerns, so manufacturing two of the same brand is not a profitable long-term business model. Chevrolet and GMC trucks and SUVs are essentially the same vehicles. Chevrolet models cost less, have equal or better quality and fuel economy, and outsell GMC models more than three to one. Toyota and other imports don't manufacture two of the same full-size vehicles under different brand names; it does not make sense, economically, for GM to continue producing both GMC and Chevrolet.

Advocates who hope to keep GMC as the auto industry changes to more fuel-efficient models want to continue a business strategy that will ultimately be as unprofitable as the now defunct brands of Hummer, Pontiac, Oldsmobile, Saturn, and Saab.

Follow the import business model, eliminate GMC now, and save the costs associated with the extra GMC manufacturing processes and distribution channels, which will not be part of a long-term solution. The new GM will be more profitable going forward without GMC if Chevrolet produces and sells all of GM's full-size trucks and SUVs.

GM won't need government and taxpayer support again if GMC is eliminated now.

Skip
Fuel guy I thought the same thing go on AM General's website click on History and it will explain the connection with GM. The Humvee are made by AM general not GM. GM makes Hummer.

Skip
Dennis the UAW has lived a lavish life style at everyone's expense. Also. is it fair to Ford that GM and Chrysler got help like this. But, I have a hard time wondering what would have happened if we didn't help them out. Hopefully Penske can save the Saturn dealers he ha s brought a lot of companies back from the grave. Wasn't GM's hybrids mostly SUV's at the beginning. Hopefully it all works out.

sadie
Why can't these overpaid executives pay more attention to the working people. Unions have had more than their share with the downfall and bankruptcy of companies. The concept of unions was great and the need was necessary back when they were organized but those days have passed. All theunion seems to produce ar lazy, overworked and underskilled employees. it seems every "failure" we have experienced has been made or built by "Union" workers. These unions have made it so bad that co-workers cannot help each other if the chore required does not specifically fit their job description. it is next to impossible to fire a union worker no matter how incompetent they are and they are not the most concientious workers because they are aware of this. At one tme is was a source of pride to have union made or union built but unfortunately due the promotion of "specialized" worker categories we have created elititists who think just because they are a union member they are better! maybe with the tough financial times we are experiencing now the members will understand they are lucky to have a job and be grateful for it instead of refusing to cooperate with cuts, etc. If every union member would take a pay cut of just $1.00 and hour per week ($40.00/wk) it could save many companies and many jobs too. This cut should hardly be noticed by these overpaid goof offs anyway!

Fuelguy
GM bankrupt, Hummer sold to a Chinese company. Military vehicles now sold to the US military by a Chinese company, how ironic

champion
I wonder if all the bailout money us taxpayers gave them, we'll get back? I doubt it very much, another government screw up. I just hope that GM and Chrysler keep the trucks and suvs comming, the hybrids are nothing more than expensive vehicles, and if you do the math on same size vehicles that are not hybrids, you'll never recoupe the money in gas savings. i know someone that works for ford in the area, and he said some hybrids they make, you must chnage the battery pack at 60K miles to the tune of 5,000 dollars. All this hype on h ybrids and fuel savings is another gov ploy to force people into being stupid, oh and dennis, by the way, that fact about GM and hybrids was on the fox new channel a long time ago, you ment to say it wasn't stated in the LIBERAL media

TM & © TM & © Harrisburg Television, Inc.
Please read our Privacy Policy. By using this site, you accept our Terms of Service.
Children's Television | EEO Reports | DTV Consumer Education Reports
WHTM-TV adheres to the ICRA RATING SYSTEM
Closed Captioning Contact Information

Pages throughout the WHTM website feature links to other sites, some of which are operated by companies unrelated to WHTM-TV.
WHTM-TV has no control over the content or availability of any linked site.

Legal Notices. "TM & © Harrisburg Television, Inc.", recognizes the privacy interests of visitors to this site on the Internet.

Satellite Home Viewer Act Information | WHTM EEO Reports CLICK HERE
{ts '2009-10-14 10:07:36'}